Jump to content
Logo
Comments
x86 license?

What happens to the x86 license?

posted by : Ian M, 07 October 2008Complain about this comment
geeeez

wow that charlie really loves to say "i told you so"

posted by : Sum Gui, 07 October 2008Complain about this comment
Two Divisions Under One Flag?

Big Money to Rescue? Timmy Goes Dickens? Shanghai'd? This sounds like defining of Duties to elaborate Greater effiecentcies. Not Two Seperate Corporate Entities or it is split, as Permissions was mentioned, How About Administrative Rights to Split Notchie in Half? Instead what if AMD Reverse Stock Split, Now its so Cheap? for every 5 shares out there, give blokes One Share Back @ $20, with Shangie Doing Soon Pushup., Instant Profit, thats what Guests Get. drashek

posted by : a.MD, 07 October 2008Complain about this comment
x86 license, indeed.

Seems like AMD's trying to cheat death one more time, and Intel will hopefully wise enough to net let them succeed.

posted by : Proesterchen, 07 October 2008Complain about this comment
Ahh aren't you missing someone?

Surely IBM fits in to your two tiered scheme somehow?

posted by : The *Inquisitor, 07 October 2008Complain about this comment
All stories eventually come true.

Just goes to show that is the Inquirer posted it, it's true.

posted by : Someone Special, 07 October 2008Complain about this comment
we told you so?

you also told me google is gonna buy valve... still waiting for that to happen though. hehe.

posted by : shiznix, 07 October 2008Complain about this comment
Actually, it might be better

There are several companies in the last 10 years had gone from end-to-end business, to spinning off the manufacturing to make it more competitive. Acer spin off the manufacturing (Winstron) to concentrate on brand marketing, D-Link spin off its manufacturing (Alpha Networks), Asus also spin off its manufacturing (Unihan). Dell is also looking for a buyer for its manufacturing business. Once you remove the large overhead of manufacturing, competing head on will be easier, unless the management makes an unrepairable mistake.

posted by : Roy Jao, 08 October 2008Complain about this comment
More room for income

You could look at this another way. As a design firm, or foundry, AMD would be open to designing or manufactoring as an independant company/s. So if AMD's processors are floundering they can bring in source work. Alternately they can provide outside design services. It would also allow those portions of the company to focus both resources and technologies on their specific expertise, and negate some standing time as one portion of the company waits for other to catch up. Of course it may be just a way to justify that type of work to share holders. I await the thoughts of those involved.

posted by : Bryan, 07 October 2008Complain about this comment
good idea

I think it is good that AMD may split into a foundary company and a design house. the foundary part will make it easier for fabless companies to get to market...VIA Isiah anyone?

posted by : Niki Mistry, 07 October 2008Complain about this comment
x86 licence not a problem.

AMD keeps a 44% stake in the new foundry company and a 50.1% decision making stake affectively meaning its still a AMD company. and intel does NOT want AMD to go under. it would have every anti-trust watchdog in the world springing on its nek minutes after that would happen and thats the last thing any company wants. and in 2011 when the x86 license is up for renegotiation, and AMD has a strong negotiating position because of the anti-trust lawsuits already running against intel. that part of the agreement will likely be scrapt entirely.

posted by : Countess, 08 October 2008Complain about this comment

AMD finally goes fabless

Advertisement
Subscribe to the INQ Newsletter
Sign-up for the INQBot weekly newsletter
Click here to sign up Existing user
Advertisement
INQ Poll

Consumer Electronics Show

CES 2009 shrinks through lack of interest